🔗 Share this article

Established parties in power are increasingly allowing the radical right to dictate the political agenda, according to a new research conducted in Germany.

Academics discovered that this phenomenon has inadvertently benefited far-right groups by validating their viewpoints and spreading them to a broader audience.

Analysis Drawing from Over 20 Years of Media Reporting

The results, published in the academic journal on political studies, relied on an automated text analysis of over 520,000 news pieces from a half-dozen national publications.

Capital-based scholars observed that as the radical faction shifted from fringe issues in the late 1990s to central subjects like integration and migration, mainstream political groups increasingly adjusted their communication in response.

This adjustment amplified the dissemination of these ideas and signaled to the electorate that such positions were legitimate.

Implications for Democratic Systems

"Public discourse by mainstream political groups is crucial in the electoral success of the radical right," stated a expert in political behavior participating in the study.

"This factor has been underestimated," she added.

The effect was evident even when conventional parties were condemning the far right. "You're still giving them attention," the researcher remarked. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a battle for attention, this attention is key."

Normalisation Phenomenon Throughout the Continent

While the study was centered around the German context, this mainstreaming phenomenon is probable to affect nations throughout Europe.

"This is frequently observed in European media," explained another co-author. "The far right makes a statement and everyone begins discussing it for several days."

"Even if you're countering it, you're repeating it," he stated.

Toughening of Political Discourse

At certain points, political figures have also toughened their discourse to match that of the radical right.

In a recent interview, a former national leader advocated widespread deportations and pushed for them to happen "more frequently and rapidly."

Comparable examples can be observed throughout Europe, as politicians from countries including the UK to the French Republic adopt the language of the far right, especially on immigration.

This has created an feedback loop that was inconceivable a ten years prior.

Core Problem: Who Sets the Narrative?

"{If you're a centrist political group and you are discussing societal topics – migration, integration – in a way that is dictated by the pace of the far right, that's the essence of agenda setting," explained a researcher.

Other political parties have gone one step further, seeking to copy the strict platform of the radical right, even as studies suggests that this approach drives voters to vote for the far right.

Progressive Impact and Public Perception

The scope of data gathered revealed that the impact of radical parties had been progressive and had increased with the passage of time.

"Public perception doesn't change from one day to another," commented a researcher. "However, when you encounter this pessimistic narrative around migration every second week, and it is being disseminated not only by far-right parties but also, for instance, by established political organizations, then of course this storyline travels further."

Need for Mainstream Parties to Develop Their Distinct Narratives

The study emphasized the necessity for established parties to carve out their own narratives, especially on topics such as immigration and assimilation, rather than continuously trailing after the radical right.

"It's like a dance," explained one researcher. "If the conductor is far-right and you're reacting to it, you lose the ability to choose which music should be heard."